![]() Now that we’ve covered the licensing models we need to talk about the different editions. Microsoft Server SQL Editions and Features That’s a lot to keep in mind when taking a decision, but don’t worry, I’ve got just what you need! Just follow the decision tree below and see where you end up, simple as that! ![]() Furthermore, Server + CAL licensing usally ends up being substantially cheaper for smaller organizations. ![]() In comparison, the Server + CAL model might feel a bit complex, but it’s easy to manage for smaller organizations. Therefore core-based licensing is generally cheaper for large organizations. Plus, keep in mind that the number of employees and SQL servers usually don’t grow in a linear fashion. They might have a hard time tracking the number of CALs needed for their SQL servers. Imagine a large global organization with users and devices across the world. Moreover, core-based licensing is usually better for large companies as it is easier to manage. This is essentially an almost impossible task to keep track of. That’s because the Server + CAL model would require your organization to purchase a user/device CAL for every external user/device accessing the SQL server. Core-based licensing is usually the only choice when SQL servers are being accessed externally (outside the company network). Choosing a SQL licensing model: Per Core or Server + CAL?ĭeciding on a licensing model can be a difficult task as both options have their own set of benefits.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |